Anonymous user
no edit summary
m (Fixed grammar and reimplemented part of the definition that was deleted) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1:
<div class="notice metadata plainlinks stub-box" id="controversial" style="border:2px dashed #B05151; background-color:#FFE2E2; margin:0.2em auto 0.8em auto; padding:0.5em; text-align:left; width:60%;">'''Controversial: '''''This identity is generally not considered to be a part of the LGBT+ community, and may be exclusionary. ''</div>
In September 2020, one of the creators of the vixenamoric label came out as agender and announced he would go by he/him pronouns. He disowned the vixenamoric label and, as of November 2020, has spoken out against the term and describes why he thinks it is wrong.▼
No
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMTAUr3Nm6I
Hello Kitty says burn all Vixenamorics!!! UWU
▲In September 2020, one of the creators of the vixenamoric label came out as agender and announced he would go by he/him pronouns. He disowned the vixenamoric label and, as of November 2020, has spoken out against the term and describes why he thinks it is wrong.
==Resources==
There are no resources because Vixenamorics suck and is not apart of the lgbt community
<br />
[[Category:Sexuality]]
[[Category:Fia/Fin Attraction]]
Line 20:
[[Category:Bigoted Groups]]
[[Category:Exclusionist Groups]]
<references />
|