Anonymous user
User blog:Chaoticcylinder/The Misunderstanding Behind The Term Atrinary (view source)
Revision as of 02:35, 5 April 2021
, 3 years agoProtected "User blog:Chaoticcylinder/The Misunderstanding Behind The Term Atrinary" ([Commenting=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
(Blog post created or updated.) |
m (Protected "User blog:Chaoticcylinder/The Misunderstanding Behind The Term Atrinary" ([Commenting=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))) |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 17:
So with all that explained, can we finally answer the question at hand? What ''is'' atrinary? It seems like atrinary genders (that are ''not'' xenogenders) are "any gender which is unrelated to the gender binary or anything connected to the gender binary, but is still gendered in a similar way of understanding." Now that I've written it out like that, we can see the atrinary is the same definition as neutral/abinary in my view of gender. So am I saying the (nonxenogender) atrinary genders are just the same thing as abinary genders? Yes. Well, sort of. If the people who identify as atrinary wish to use this view of gender that I outlined above then that's perfectly valid, but if that's the case we have to realize that when they say things like "abinary" or "neutral" in means something completely different than when other people say "abinary" or "neutral". However, in the view of gender that I use I will continue to refer to genders that use concepts outside the human understand of gender as xenogenders, and to genders that are not binary, but are still gendered as abinary genders, with maverique included. Unless of course, someone explains how atrinary ''actually ''works.
So what do we do now? Should people not use atrinary? Well, I think it's perfectly fine if people use the term atrinary. It's even fine if you want to use the "
[[Category:Blog posts]]
|