Quoisensual: Difference between revisions

Help

Content added Content deleted

VisualWikitext

Inline

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 # Being unsure what [[Sensual Attraction|sensual attraction]] is, and therefore being unsure if one has experienced it or not
-# Finding the concept of sensuality/sensual attraction to be inaccessible, inapplicable, or nonsensical
+# Finding the concepts of sensuality/sensual attraction to be inaccessible, inapplicable, or nonsensical
 # Being unable to understand sensual attraction as a concept or feeling disidentifying with the concept of sensual attraction, either as a social construct or as something potentially applicable to oneself
 # Questioning sensuality for such a long time that the questioning itself becomes the sensuality, rather than a path toward any other identity
 # Having a difficulty distinguishing sensual attraction from other types of attraction
-Quoisensuality is often considered an [[Asensual Spectrum|sen-spec]] identity, though not all quoisensuals identify with the [[Asensual Spectrum|asensual spectrum]]. Quoisensuality can more accurately be understood as a disidentification with the [[Sensual Attraction|sensual]]/[[asensual]] binary, which may or may not overlap with an [[Asensual Spectrum|sen-spec]] identity.
+Quoisensuality is often considered an [[Asensual Spectrum|asen-spec]] identity, though not all quoisensuals identify with the [[Asensual Spectrum|asensual spectrum]]. Quoisensuality can more accurately be understood as a disidentification with the [[Sensual Attraction|sensual]]/[[asensual]] binary, which may or may not overlap with an [[Asensual Spectrum|asen-spec]] identity.
 == History and Etymology ==
 The term quoiromantic was first coined by Tumblr user Epochryphal (Cor) in 2012, based on quoi, the French word for "what."